This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Before Murdock [the CEO] made his proposal, Carter [the GC] made false disclosures about the savings Dole could realize after selling approximately half of its business in 2012. By taking these actions, Murdock and Carter deprived the Committee of the ability to negotiate on a fully informed basis and potentially say no to the Merger.
If you’re looking to navigate the world of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) effectively, it’s crucial to understand the differences between sell side and buy side transactions. These two approaches to M&A can have vastly different outcomes, depending on the goals of the parties involved.
Corporate development through mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is an increasingly popular strategy for companies seeking to drive innovation and growth opportunities. It requires a strategic approach to ensure that the benefits of M&A are fully realized. This is where strategic corporate development comes into play.
In the fast-paced world of mergers and acquisitions (M&A), two titans of finance go head-to-head: venture capitalists and private equity firms. Decoding the duel between venture capitalists and private equity titans in the M&A arena is a fascinating exploration of contrasting investment styles and strategies.
Goulston & Storrs M&A attorney Dan Avery is a nationally recognized expert on M&A deal point trends. This article examines the prevalence and usage of stand-alone indemnities in private company M&A transactions with reference to the ABA studies. breaches of representations, warranties, or covenants.
For example, in the 2012 Facebook IPO, common shareholders gained exposure to the tech giant's fortunes, while also securing a say in corporate matters. The distinction between them is crucial for understanding a company's obligations, its strategy, and the interplay of interests within its ecosystem. What is a Shareholder?
M&A activity in physician practices continues to grow and outpace other sectors as deals in the healthcare industry are coveted by investors for their strong growth, recession resistance, and superior historical returns.
So far this year, deal parties are approaching M&A with cautious optimism. This series of Cooley M&A blog posts include some brief observations that offer some M&A highlights over the past year and our thoughts for the year to come. Read more from our 2017 M&A Trends Series. Appraisal Risks Factor High.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 38,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content